General Electric Vice Electric Company Essay - 1395 Words

General Electric General Electric Co. (GE) is a major American corporation one of the biggest and the most differentiated corporation and most powerful business in the world. According to Fortune 500 GE, gross revenue registered as the 26th foremost business association and its name incorporated among the top rankers in the survey. The company functioning in many different sectors its invention consist of electrical and electronic appliance, aircraft engines, financial services, and Energy Technology (Electric, General Electric Success Story, 2016). In 1878, Thomas Alva Edison founded General Electric, in 1892, the company combined Edison General Electrical Company, Schenectady, and Thomson-Houston Electric Company of Lynn, Massachusetts while its headquarters are in Fairfield, Connecticut United State, its operating plants were in New York. Jeffrey Immelt chairperson and chief executive officer of General Electric on September 7, 2001 to replace Jack Welch after his retirement (Electric, General El ectric Success Story, 2016). In the early years, the company was more motivated toward computer manufacturing industry, however due to the lack of technical aspect GE sold its computer-manufacturing unit of Honeywell in 1970, there after GE functioned its computer manufacturing division under the name General Electric Information Services (GEIS). General Electric gains various companies during its operations run; its substantial achievements were RCA for NBC Television NetworkShow MoreRelatedGeneral Electric Company ( Ge )1394 Words   |  6 PagesGeneral Electric company (GE) is one of the world s most admired, valuable, and largest companies in the world. GE is also one of the top five oldest industries in the United States, at a 130 years. This great American company has been stayed in business because of the many great leaders who have led the success for GE. Leader s such as, Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt, have brought many changes at GE bringing the company into the 20th centur y. Jack Welch and Jeff Immelt have been very successful atRead MoreLincoln Electric : A Leading Business Model For Management970 Words   |  4 Pages Lincoln Electric: A Leading Business Management Model submitted on Wednesday, 8 July 2015, 3:54 AM In Review of the Company Culture of Lincoln Electric What Makes This a Leading Business Model for Management? One of the biggest challenges faced within many companies of recent times as well as in the past is that of motivating employees to tackle the responsibilities given to them with initiative, focus, and a strong sense of duty. It is a challenge that supervisors and team leaders, for instanceRead MoreJohn C. Lincoln Electric Company727 Words   |  3 PagesJohn C. Lincoln founded The Lincoln Electric Company in 1895. James F. Lincoln, John’s younger brother join the company and subsequently became general manager and vice president in 1914. One of James early actions was to have a committee that would advise him on company operations. Employees was asked to elect representatives to the committee. They met twice monthly with the executive officer ever since. A welding school was formed in 1917 and still continues today. In 1918 an employee bonus planRead MoreThe Legacy Of The Lincoln Electric Company Essay718 Words   |  3 PagesThe Lincoln Electric Company proves that the right mix of â€Å"organizational culture styles† can achieve profitable business growth over the long haul. The continuing influence, employee benefits/incentives, and management styles initiated by company founder John C. Lincoln and James F. Lincoln have built a profitable business for shareholders and employees alike. Let’s, look at Mr. Author Sharplins Harvard Case study and The Lincoln Electric Company webpage to further delineate the styles of organizationalRead MoreLincoln Electric s Winning Organization730 Words   |  3 PagesLincoln Electric s Winning Organisation Lincoln Electric is a long-standing, successful company. In business for 120 years, they make welders, electrodes and welding accessories. They operate worldwide, and their sales offices cover more than 160 countries. The company was originally founded in 1895 by John C. Lincoln to make electric motors he had patented. In 1907, he brought on his younger brother, James F. Lincoln, who began leading the company according to his ideals in 1914 as both General ManagerRead MoreImplementing A Strategy Action Oriented1021 Words   |  5 PagesWHAT MUST BE DONE According to Wheelen and and Hunger, the purpose of a program is â€Å"to make a strategy action oriented.† In the previous section, we documented the recommended business, corporate, and functional strategies as well as policies General Electric must implement. These new strategies and policies are no guarantees but will need time to be implemented. The success also determines on how well the management teams will describe the importance of implementing these new strategies. The managersRead MoreThe Legacy Of Lincoln Electric Company Essay985 Words   |  4 PagesFrom a company started with 1895 with only $200 (roughly $6,000 in 2016 with inflation) and a dream, Lincoln Electric company has grown exponentially over the past 121 years. John C. Lincoln, disenfranchised with his lack of involvement with the Elliot-Lincoln company he was formerly with, set out to develop and manufacture a new patented form of electric motors. Lincoln Electric company, officially incorporated in 1906 by John C. Lincoln, was created as an engine manufacturer. In 1907, James FRead MoreThe Legacy Of Lincoln Electric Company951 Words   |  4 PagesLincoln Electric Company What is the right culture to choose for your business? Do you want to be team oriented, innovative, aggressive or outcome oriented? For a business, this decision, of choosing a work culture often dictates unforeseen outcomes. But why choose one? The Lincoln Electric Company decided to use many of the of the seven work culture profiles to create their own unique business culture. It will be the goal of this essay to understand the seven different work cultures and discoverRead MoreLincoln Electric Company s Culture1291 Words   |  6 PagesThe Lincoln Electric Company s culture is a wonderful example of how to create an exceptional culture within your business. Lincoln Electric has been a leading manufacturer in welding machines and electrodes for over 100 years. During this impressive tenure, the Lincoln Electric Company has adhered to its founders’ philosophy that the customer always comes first, the employee always comes second, and stockholders come third. This ph ilosophy is upheld throughout the entire organization, fromRead MoreLincoln Electric Culture Case Analysis916 Words   |  4 PagesLincoln Electric Culture Case analysis. One of the world s biggest maker of welding machine and electrodes is the Lincoln Electric company. Since 1965, has seen the higher net income and incentives. Employees turnover is nonexistent except for retirement and Lincoln s organization culture supported on closeness, trust, percentage control and classless tone is one of the reason why its so prosperous. History and influence of ownership In 1895, John C. Lincoln took out his second patent and began

Maslow s Theory Of Self Actualization Essay - 2048 Words

Abraham Maslow theorized the concept of self-actualization which is the term used to describe the state of self-fulfillment in which people realize their highest potentials in their own unique way. Maslow’s theory includes sublevels that must be achieved before reaching self-actualization. In this paper, I will explain how each of his previous levels have affected my life, and give an idea of when I may hope to achieve self-actualization. Self-actualization is the term that Abraham Maslow used to describe the state of self-fulfillment in which people realize their highest potentials in their own unique way. The personal reflections accommodate to my perspective of the Maslow’s Theory. In Abraham Maslow’s theory of self-actualization, the first level is basic needs. The basic needs consist of survival necessities, basic needs are the lowest level of the hierarchy. Some of these basic needs are the need of air, food, drink, shelter, warmth, sleep. Only after meeting the basic lower-order needs can a person fulfill higher-order needs, such as the needs for love and a sense of belonging, esteem, and self-actualization (http://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html.) People have a physical need for homeostasis, which is the body’s tendency to maintain a steady internal state, underlies primary drives. The biological needs of a person are motivated the drives of a person, such as hunger, thirst, sleep, and sex, which are related to the biological needs of the body. Motivation isShow MoreRelatedMaslow s Theory Of Self Actualization772 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction: The theory of self-actualization was introduced by psychologist Abraham Maslow. Maslow s famous work â€Å"Hierarchy of Needs† has drawn admiration and criticisms from supporters and opponents alike. For Maslow, man quest for self-actualization falls within five hierarchical orders set up in a pyramid style. To become everything that one is capable of becoming, Maslow, noted that the order in which these needs are fulfilled does not always follow the standard progression. FurtherRead MoreMaslow s Theory Of Self Actualization1824 Words   |  8 PagesMaslow Abraham H. Maslow, an American psychologist who explores the complexities of human nature in his theoretical piece, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, examines the theory of self-actualization. This theory, which focuses on experiencing completely, evocatively and selflessly while maintaining full focus and absorption, is practiced to become the best version of oneself and undergo transcendence (44). Maslow’s ideals are influential and implemented by James Arthur Baldwin. Baldwin, a civilRead MoreMaslow s Theory Of Self Actualization1221 Words   |  5 PagesGreenwood Dictionary of Education (2011), Abraham Maslow, an American psychologist, believed that everyone has a need for self-actualization, to develop an individual’s full potential by maximizing his/her talents and abilities. Maslow proposed that human needs are categorized in a hierarchy into the following requirements (from basic to complex and/or advanced needs): physiological, safety, love and belonging, e steem, and then self-actualization (Maslow, 2006). The hierarchy is often projected as aRead MoreAbraham Maslow s Theory Of Self Actualization901 Words   |  4 Pagesman named Abraham Maslow. Maslow was an American psychologist who developed a pyramidal hierarchy of needs. At the base of his pyramid, Abraham Maslow placed the basic â€Å"physiological needs† such as: food, water, and sleep. The next layer of his pyramid was â€Å"safety†, which was followed by â€Å"love/belonging†, and then â€Å"esteem†. Although, my interest truly began when I reached the very top of the pyramid which was labeled â€Å"self-actualization†. Self-actualization was the term Maslow used to describeRead MoreMaslow s Theories Of The Hierarchy Of Basic Human Needs And Self Actualization Essay1072 Words   |  5 Pagesglobally representative. This survey had the objective of confirming or dismissing Maslow’s famous theories of the hierarchy of basic human needs and self-actualization. Maslow’s theory, whether one believes it or not, is still a theory that is debated by psychologists. This article argues that Maslow’s theory features many flaws, such as its fuzziness when it came the main concept of self-actualization and stipulate that the main disagreement reported towards it by psychologists is the fact that itRead MoreHumanistic Theories Debate On Abraham Maslow And Carl Rogers1617 Words   |  7 PagesHumanistic Theories Debate Team B – Anthony Garcia, Becky Billison, Cher Keen, Britanie McKernan, Megan Groulx PSY/310 September 7, 2015 Dr. Sadie Fine â€Æ' Humanistic Theories Debate In the debate between Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers, both whom are humanistic theorists that share a mutual interest in the teachings of self-actualization, will discuss the specifics of their individual theories regarding the main points, their contributions, and the criticism they have received about their theories. We willRead MoreKurt Maslow s Concept Of Self Actualization1115 Words   |  5 PagesRogers self-actualization theory continues to have significant influence in contemporary psychology. Both Maslow and Rogers discussed the concept of self-actualization in their theories. Though there is some overlap, there are some significant differences in the way they use this term. In this assignment you are to compare and contrast their views on self-actualization. Answer the following questions: 1. Briefly describe Maslow’s concept of self-actualization Abraham Maslow s concept of self-actualizationRead MoreA Nursing Practice Theory : Unifying Holistic Approach Essay933 Words   |  4 PagesA Nursing Practice Theory: Unifying Holistic Approach Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Influences of Theory and Theorist It is undeniable that Maslow is one of the most famous and influential psychologists, whose theory is a base for various motivation theories. Maslow`s Hierarchy of Needs theory explains the drives and the urges that govern human behavior. However, there were many other famous psychologists influencing Maslow during his lifetime; indeed, this fact greatly shaped his professional stanceRead MoreAbraham Maslow s Influence On The Human Psyche1660 Words   |  7 PagesAbraham Maslow. He is cited as one of the top ten psychologists of all time, which is not an easy task to achieve. Abraham Maslow was born on April 1 in 1908 in Brooklyn New York. He comes from a Jewish background with his parents coming from Russia as immigrants to the United States of America. Maslow’s childhood was not a good or easy one as one would think of such a successful person. His father and mother more times than not often ill treated him, which led to his poor self esteem. Maslow oftenRead MorePsychology : The Positive Psychology Movement1269 Words   |  6 Pagesaspects in determining how to enhance the personality by helping individuals recognize their human potential to learn and achieve. In this assignment one will compare the view points of Maslow, Rogers, and the positive psychology movement concerning individual personality. Recent studies have shown that personality theory and assessment plays an important role in the new era of positive psychology. Positive psychology today, emphasizes that personal strengths and their contribution to an individual well-being

The Law on Involuntary Manslaughter

Question: The law on Involuntary Manslaughter highlights key questions about the proper scope of criminal responsibility, including imposing liability for omissions and controversy surrounding the mens rea requirements that are considered appropriate for serious offences in England Wales. Explain the above statement, illustrating your points with examples from case law. Answer: Involuntary manslaughter has to be distinguished from voluntary manslaughter because in the case of former, there is a lack of intention to kill. According to the law, involuntary manslaughter has been divided in three categories which are unlawful act or constructive manslaughter; gross negligence manslaughter or medical manslaughter and the other categories that of reckless manslaughter. In this way, it is clear that a wide range of situations are covered by involuntary manslaughter and it is also echoed in the verdicts that are given by the courts. In case of unlawful act or constructive manslaughter, it is required that the death of the victim should have been caused by an unlawful act which is something more than a civil wrong (R v Franklin, 1883). In such a case it is required that the unlawful act can be considered as dangerous by applying the reasonable person standard. This means that an objective test has to be applied and not a subjective test (R v Church, 1965). According to this test, there should be an act as merely an omission cannot result in creating liability (R v Lowe, 1973). In the same way, it is also required that the unlawful act should have resulted in causing the death as was stated by the court in R v Kennedy (2005). Challenging decisions need to be made in which the death of a person has been caused by injecting a drug. The effect of the decisions given in these cases is that the courts have a reason to scrutinize what can be considered as an unlawful act or constructive manslaughter. At present, it appears that the law provides in this regard that if the drug has been supplied by the defendant but nothing more has been done by the defendant towards administering the drug, generally the court will come to the conclusion that the death has not been caused by the defendant (R v Dalby, 1982). On the other hand, if the person has been helped by the defendant in taking the drug, and such an act has resulted in the death of the person, the defendant can be held guilty of manslaughter (R v Rodgers, 2003). In the same way, if the injection has been prepared by the present but victim took the needle and injected himself or herself with a deadly dose, the defendant can still be considered as guilty of unl awful act manslaughter because in such a case, an unlawful act of administering a noxious substance has been committed by the defendant as provided by section 23, Offenses Against the Person Act, 1861 (R v Kennedy, 2005). Test that can be used in case of unlawful act manslaughter is an objective test however the act can also be related with property. At the same time, it is also required that the risk of harm should be of a physical harm and when they say it is not sufficient if there is a fear or concern even if it has resulted in the victim suffering from a heart attack. However, if the defendant was aware of the weakness of the victim and also the risk that is faced by the victim, in such a case the defendant can be held as liable. However the law requires that they should be evidence to support that the defendant had the mens rea for committing the act, even though it is not necessary that the defendant realized at that time that the act was dangerous or unlawful (DPP v Newbury, 1977). On the other hand, the gross negligence manslaughter or medical manslaughter takes place when a person owes a duty of care and such a duty has been breached which resulted in the death of the victim. In R v Singh (1999), the conviction for manslaughter for gross negligence was upheld by the Court of Appeal for the death of the tenant although his son was left behind to look after the property. In the same way, a large number of immigrants were suffocated while they were under the charge of the driver of the truck that was carrying 60 illegal immigrants from China (R v Wacker, 2003). In such cases, it is required that the actus reus should be so gross that in the opinion of the jury, it appears criminal in nature and at the same time, there should be a threat of death. For example the defendant in R v Adomako (1994), was an anesthetist who failed to see that a tube inserted in patients mouth has become detached while an eye operation was going on. As a result, the patients suffered a cardiac arrest and died. The approach adopted by Lord Mackay in this case was very clear when he stated that the fact that the breach of duty on the part of the defendant amounted to gross negligence relied on the degree of seriousness of the breach on part of the defendant keeping in mind all the conditions under which the defendant was at the time when the incident happened and also to see if, considering the risk of death that was involved in this case, the conduct of the defendant can be considered as so bad under the circumstances that it amounted to a criminal act or omission in the judgment of the jury. It has been mentioned by the courts on several occasions that a duty of care is present between the doctor and the patient similarly as a duty was present in case of the relationship between the ship's owner and the crew of the ship (R. v. Litchfield, 1993). In Adamoko, the concept of gross negligence has been criticized upon which the Court of Appeal has based its judgment by submitting that its formulation involves circularity as the jury was told in effect to convict the defendant of a crime if they thought that a crime had been committed and that accordingly using gross negligence as conceptual basis for the crime of involuntary manslaughter was unsatisfactory and the law should be applied by the courts as provided in R v Seymour [1983] 2 All ER 1058, generally to all the cases in which involuntary manslaughter is involved or at least it should be used as the basis for providing general applicability and acceptability. Another case that needs to be mentioned in this regard is that of R v Stone Dobinson (1977) when a vulnerable sister of the defendant was staying with them. However, when she fell ill, the defendants did not call for a doctor. It was held by the court that a duty of care was present in this case on part of the defendants and as a result, the attitude of indifference adopted by the defendants was sufficient for substantiating the charge of gross negligence manslaughter. On the other hand, reckless manslaughter cannot be defined so easily. Before Adomako (1994), the general view was that manslaughter can be recklessly committed and an objective test has to be used in this regard. However, after this case, it started to be considered that this was not appropriate test that needs to be applied and recklessness can result in the manslaughter of the kind that was found by the court in R v Stone Dobinson (1977). As a result, now it is considered that reckless manslaughter can be present in cases involving motor vehicles which result in manslaughter. An important case in this regard is that of R v Lidar. No. 99/0339/Y4 where there was an argument between the defendant and the victim when the victim was leaning into the car of the defendants. The car was driven by the defendant at that time and as a result, the victim came under cars rear wheel. In this case, the court stated that the defendant was guilty of manslaughter. It was stated by the court of appeal that for holding the defendant liable, it is required that the defendant should have foreseen the risk of serious injury or death taking place and at the same time, it should have been assessed by the defendant that at least it is highly likely to take place (Ashworth, 1989). These days, perhaps reckless manslaughter can be defined with the help of the test that has been provided by the court in this case. It also becomes significant at this point to refer to corporate manslaughter. After the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act, 2007 was introduced in at the 2008; number of prosecutions has been increasing ever since. The meaning of this legislation is that the corporations and other organisations can also be liable of manslaughter as a result of the failure to perform the duties imposed on them properly. In case of a fatality as a result of the breach of duty of care, and it is found that the company has failed to manage health and safety procedures, the company can be held liable for corporate manslaughter (Thomas, 1978). However the law of corporate manslaughter can be criticized on the ground that in case of big corporations, it is possible that these companies may get away with the offense because there are huge resources available to them as a result, these corporations are in a better position to defend themselves against the charge of corporate manslaughter as com pared to small businesses. Perhaps the subjective definition that has been given to gross negligence manslaughter does not help at present as it suggests that whether the offense has been committed or not depends on the situation and what has happened (Field and Jorg, 1991). As a result even a question can be asked if the offense of gross negligence manslaughter is present at all. Indeed, it can be hard for jury but there are freeware and forceful authorities present regarding gross negligence manslaughter. Similarly, it cannot be supported by a idea that civil law can deal with culpability where this type of negligence has been present for a number of years (Sharpe, 1994). Probably, due to this reason, it was preferred by the Law Commission that the term criminal manslaughter should be used. Of course, the judges have to apply the law so that it can be beneficial for the jury and they may be aware of the verdict that has to be considered during their discussions. As a result, anything done with a view to faci litate jurys work is perhaps good (Smith and Hogan, 1992). Problem may not be faced by the judge regarding a reform that suggests that reckless manslaughter should be abolished which perhaps is present only in cases of motoring manslaughter (Field and Jorg, 1991). However this does not necessarily mean that our concept of second degree murder will be easier for the jury to understand or for that matter, gross negligence manslaughter. It also appears that this term is also full of probable difficulties and it is also likely that the members of the jury could have heard regarding the use of the term in America. It can be argued in this regard that it is more significant to make sure that justice is provided to the victims by devising wide and diverse range of offenses that are capable of covering all the wrongdoers, instead of having any niceties regarding the drafting (Virgo, 1995). However the work done by the Law commission in this regard is also valuable and it should not be disre garded. But in this regard it is also important to note that the Parliament has the responsibility of making sure that it is in step with the requirements of the society and also to ensure that the reforms are made according to the expectations and needs of the people (Glazebrook, 1960). At present, it may be an unwieldy part of the law, however it can be stated in this regard that this is due to the reason that it has to fulfill the requirements of the society which includes the families of the victims. Concerns have been expressed that the offenses related with the death of someone due to dangerous driving, are not capable of showing the loss of life and therefore it is important that significant care is exercised in order to make sure that the reforms regarding unlawful act manslaughter is not treated as diluting of the law and therefore, mixed signals should not be given in this regard. On the basis of the above mentioned the discussion, and considering the circumstances under which a person ought to be held criminally liable for causing death unintentionally, it can be said that this should be the case only where an obvious risk of causing death or serious injury is present, which the person was capable of appreciating. As mentioned above, involuntary manslaughter is a very wide category of offense. It appears to be inappropriate that the types of conduct which hugely vary in terms of fault should all have the same descriptive label. Moreover, as a result of the broad nature of the offense of involuntary manslaughter, problems can be traced by the judges while sentencing because in such a case, the judge is not able to receive the guidance of the jury regarding the matter is that the important for the severity of the penalty deserved, like the foresight of the accused regarding the risk of causing death. Therefore in this regard, it can be recommended that two diff erent offenses of unintentional killing should be created that are based on differing fault elements instead of having one single, broad offense. Although there can be certain disadvantages of having separate offenses but having a single and very wide offense also carries with it much greater dangers that have been discussed in this assignment. References Ashworth, 1989, The Scope of Criminal Liability for Omissions 105 LQR 424. A. Thomas, 1978, Form and Function in Criminal Law, in Peter Glazebrook (ed) Reshaping the Criminal Law p 28. Graham Virgo, 1995 Reconstructing the Law of Manslaughter on Defective Foundations CLJ 14, 16 J C Smith and B Hogan, 1992, Criminal Law (7th ed) p 373 P R Glazebrook, 1960, Criminal Omissions: The Duty Requirement in Offences Aga inst the Person 76 LQR 386 S Field and N Jrg, 1991, Corporate Liability and Manslaughter: should we be going Dutch? Crim LR 156, 158159 Celia Wells, Manslaughter and Corporate Crime (1989) 139 NLJ 931 Sybil Sharpe, 1994 Grossly Negligent Manslaughter after Adomako 158 JP 725 Case Law DPP v Newbury [1977] AC 500 R v Adomako [1994] 3 WLR 288 R v Church [1965] 2 WLR 1220 R v Dalby (1982) 74 Cr App R 348 R v Franklin (1883) 15 Cox CC 163 R v Kennedy [2005] 1 WLR 2159 R v Kennedy [2005] 1 WLR 2159 R v Lowe [1973] QB 702 R v Rodgers [2003] 1 WLR 1374 R v Stone Dobinson [1977] 1 QB 354 R v Wacker [2003] 1 Cr App R 329 v. Litchfield, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 333 Singh, R v [1999] CA

Shelly, Mary Frankenstein Lack Of Verisimilitude Essays (315 words)

Shelly, Mary: Frankenstein: Lack Of Verisimilitude Period 3 Frankenstein In Mary Shelly's novel Frankenstein, one must use their imagination in order to believe the story line. Throughout the novel there are many obvious inconsistencies along with impossibilities. This can be called a lack of verisimilitude, which means that the plot of the story isn't quite believable. An example of the lack of verisimilitude in the novel is how the creature came to life and was instantly capable of living unaided. Things like walking are acquired, but instantly as soon as the monster came to life he walked away. Another example is how the monster found the whereabouts of his creator from a piece of paper in a pocket. From this piece of paper he was able to find him. The monster also starts talking fluently and learns to read in a short period of time just from watching the De Lacey's through a hole in their cabin. The monster understands things that even an educated man wouldn't, and thinks of things also. Like how he framed Justine for the murder of William by placing the locket in her pocket while she slept. Than there are also many coincidences that are just too much to believe. The fact that Victor himself is accused for the murder of Henry Clerval for one. Another is how the monster manages to be in the right place at the right time all the time. In conclusion, the lack of verisimilitude in the novel doesn't make Mary Shelly any less of a brilliant writer for her time period. Since the writing of her novel there have been many other books and movies using her unique plot, which was one of the first science fiction novels of that time. We also must realize that the movies we watch today have even less verisimilitude than Shelly's novel and we still go along with it.